Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Petition for Review from RTC to CA (Rule 42)

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A compliant Rule 42 appeal concerns an ordinary non-tax, non-expedited civil judgment, with no applicable immediately-executory rule and no contrary CA order. The prevailing party says the petition can never stay execution because all petitions for review have the same effect. Which is correct?
  1. Every petition for review is automatically non-staying under every rule
  2. Rule 42’s ordinary stay rule applies in the stipulated setting, subject to its stated exceptions
  3. The filing automatically extinguishes the judgment
  4. The appellant obtains judgment on the merits merely by filing
  5. The petition always transfers ownership of disputed property

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html — Rule 42 sections 1–3, 6 and 8, ordinary RTC appellate decisions, petition requirements, extension, perfection and stay; special statutory finality or appeal routes remain controlling.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2005/sep2005/gr_141524_2005.html — Neypes v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 141524, September 14, 2005, fresh fifteen-day appeal period after a proper timely motion and application to Rule 42.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.