Philippine Bar review · Topic

Petition for Review from RTC to CA (Rule 42)

Explore Petition for Review from RTC to CA (Rule 42) in Modes for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. In an ordinary civil case without a special finality or appeal rule, Rule 42 ordinarily reviews an RTC decision rendere…
  2. What is Rule 42’s ordinary filing period from notice of the reviewed decision or denial of a proper timely new-trial or…
  3. What issues may an ordinary Rule 42 petition identify as errors by the RTC?
  4. An RTC has decided an appeal in an ordinary non-tax civil case not governed by a special unappealable-decision rule. Th…
  5. Before the Rule 42 period expires, a party files the proper extension motion and pays the required full fees and cost d…
  6. In an appealable ordinary RTC appellate case, a party files a proper first reconsideration motion within the original p…
  7. A compliant Rule 42 appeal concerns an ordinary non-tax, non-expedited civil judgment, with no applicable immediately-e…
  8. Identify Rule 42’s ordinary source decision, reviewing court and principal filing requirements, assuming no special sta…
  9. A proper reconsideration motion was filed in due time from an appealable RTC appellate decision and was denied. Explain…
  10. Distinguish Rule 42’s extension mechanism from an automatic extension obtained simply by intending to appeal. Include t…
  11. Should lower courts and judges be impleaded merely because their decisions are reviewed under Rule42?
  12. Does Rule42 Section2 specify copies of the dispositions of both lower courts?