Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Distinction

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A reviewer finds that an object meets Article 52(2)'s military-objective test. The reviewer therefore declares that every possible attack on it is lawful, without considering civilian harm or precautions. What is the flaw?
  1. Military objectives may never be attacked under any circumstances.
  2. Status as a military objective does not dispense with proportionality and applicable precautionary duties.
  3. Civilian harm is relevant only when ownership is disputed.
  4. Object classification is determined solely after the conflict.
  5. Precautions apply only to attacks on civilian objects.

Legal references

  • Additional Protocol I (1977), Article48: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-48
  • Additional Protocol I (1977), Article51: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-51
  • Additional Protocol I (1977), Article52: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-52
  • Additional Protocol I (1977), Article57: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-57

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.