Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Intergenerational Equity

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A claimant argues that Oposa’s recognition of future generations automatically canceled every timber license and dispensed with participation of affected licensees. Which is correct?
  1. Every license was automatically canceled
  2. Intergenerational responsibility establishes ecological representation but does not by itself award every requested remedy or erase due process
  3. Licensees can never be affected by litigation
  4. The case held environmental rights nonexistent
  5. Future generations must wait until all resources are exhausted

Legal references

  • https://www.un.org/esa/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm — Rio Declaration (1992), Principle 3
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1993/jul1993/gr_101083_1993.html — Oposa v. Factoran, G.R. No. 101083, July 30, 1993, main opinion

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.