Philippine Bar review · Topic

Intergenerational Equity

Explore Intergenerational Equity in Rio Declaration (1992) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Whose developmental and environmental needs does Rio Principle 3 require development to meet equitably?
  2. What concept supported the minors’ personality to sue for succeeding generations in Oposa v. Factoran?
  3. Which resource-management outlook best expresses intergenerational equity?
  4. Officials assess a project solely by this year’s revenue and refuse to consider lasting loss of water resources needed …
  5. A developer says intergenerational equity requires ignoring present communities because only unborn persons matter. Is …
  6. Minors invoke Oposa to assert ecological interests of succeeding generations. Their opponent says unborn generations ca…
  7. A claimant argues that Oposa’s recognition of future generations automatically canceled every timber license and dispen…
  8. Explain intergenerational equity under Rio Principle 3. Does it prohibit all present development?
  9. Explain Oposa’s treatment of intergenerational responsibility and the minors’ capacity to represent succeeding generati…
  10. A proposal permanently depletes a water source for short-term gain. Explain the relevance of intergenerational equity w…
  11. In the 2025 opinion, how are present generations described in the intergenerational-equity discussion?
  12. Under paragraph 157, what is the legal role of intergenerational equity?