Philippine Bar review · Topic
Intergenerational Equity
Explore Intergenerational Equity in Rio Declaration (1992) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Whose developmental and environmental needs does Rio Principle 3 require development to meet equitably?
- What concept supported the minors’ personality to sue for succeeding generations in Oposa v. Factoran?
- Which resource-management outlook best expresses intergenerational equity?
- Officials assess a project solely by this year’s revenue and refuse to consider lasting loss of water resources needed …
- A developer says intergenerational equity requires ignoring present communities because only unborn persons matter. Is …
- Minors invoke Oposa to assert ecological interests of succeeding generations. Their opponent says unborn generations ca…
- A claimant argues that Oposa’s recognition of future generations automatically canceled every timber license and dispen…
- Explain intergenerational equity under Rio Principle 3. Does it prohibit all present development?
- Explain Oposa’s treatment of intergenerational responsibility and the minors’ capacity to represent succeeding generati…
- A proposal permanently depletes a water source for short-term gain. Explain the relevance of intergenerational equity w…
- In the 2025 opinion, how are present generations described in the intergenerational-equity discussion?
- Under paragraph 157, what is the legal role of intergenerational equity?