Practice question
After a program is invalidated, an officer claims that the operative fact doctrine gives him conclusive immunity. A complainant instead argues that invalidity conclusively proves bad faith. Evaluate both claims under Araullo's 2015 resolution.
Legal references
- Araullo v. Aquino III, G.R. No. 209287 et al., February 3, 2015 Resolution, sections 6–7, https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2015/feb2015/gr_209287_2015.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.