Practice question
A treaty authorizes information sharing only for maritime rescue. A later executive agreement purporting to implement it adds a wholly unrelated permanent obligation to finance foreign commercial advertising. The Government concedes the obligation is neither expressly authorized nor reasonably implied by any law or treaty, and identifies no other authority. Which is the strongest Saguisag objection?
- Every new detail is forbidden even if authorized.
- Foreign advertising automatically changes the Philippine Constitution.
- Only the number of pages matters.
- An implementing executive agreement cannot unduly expand obligations beyond those allowed or necessarily implied in its legal basis.
- The existence of one rescue treaty authorizes every future international obligation.
Legal references
- Saguisag v. Ochoa, G.R. Nos. 212426 and 212444, January 12, 2016, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2016/jan2016/gr_212426_2016.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.