Philippine Bar review · Topic
Treaties and International Agreements
Explore Treaties and International Agreements in Diplomatic Powers for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- For a treaty governed by Article VII, Section 21, what Senate concurrence is constitutionally required?
- Under Pimentel, who exercises the executive act of treaty ratification, subject to the constitutional Senate concurrenc…
- Which statement reflects Saguisag's main holding concerning executive agreements?
- A Philippine representative signs a treaty expressly subject to ratification. The President has not decided to ratify i…
- The President concludes a technical arrangement that validly implements an existing treaty, creates no new commitment r…
- The executive branch calls a proposed international instrument an executive agreement. Its legal team argues that this …
- The President approves an arrangement modeled on EDCA. Challengers contend that the Supreme Court's 2016 main decision …
- A treaty expressly requiring ratification has been signed by an authorized Philippine representative. Petitioners claim…
- Explain why Saguisag's recognition of executive agreements does not mean the President may avoid Senate concurrence for…
- The President's advisers claim that the Senate itself ratifies treaties and that a concurrence resolution replaces ever…
- In Pimentel’s description of treaty making, what is the primary function of signature when the instrument remains subje…
- According to Pimentel, may treaty negotiations be conducted by the head of state’s authorized representatives?