Practice question
Officers unlawfully intercept a person's private correspondence in violation of Article III. The prosecution offers only a typed summary of its contents. The person timely objects. Which is best?
- Typing always removes the defect
- Only the original paper can be excluded
- Changing the format does not by itself cure the unconstitutional acquisition
- A summary is automatically a lawful court order
- The right disappears when officials read the correspondence
Legal references
- 1987 Constitution, Article III, Sections 2 and 3: https://lawphil.net/consti/cons1987.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.