Practice question
A tribunal gives a respondent notice of allegation A and a chance to answer it. It then finds liability solely for unrelated allegation B, first disclosed in the final decision, and concedes there was no earlier chance to address B. It defends the process merely by pointing to the hearing on A. Which analysis is best?
- Any hearing on any subject satisfies due process for every later charge.
- The opportunity concerning A does not automatically supply a meaningful chance to meet the decisive unrelated B ground.
- Administrative flexibility makes every undisclosed charge lawful.
- The agency may replace notice with private surprise whenever convenient.
- The respondent must prove acquittal on all imaginable charges in advance.
Legal references
- Ang Tibay v. Court of Industrial Relations, G.R. No. 46496, February 27, 1940, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1940/feb1940/gr_46496_1940.html
- Labastida v. Quires, G.R. No. 251903, January 27, 2025, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/jan2025/gr_251903_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.