Philippine Bar review · Topic

Administrative Due Process

Explore Administrative Due Process in Quasi-judicial or Adjudicatory Power for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Which administrative-hearing right did Ang Tibay identify?
  2. What evidentiary level did Ang Tibay identify for administrative findings?
  3. Why should an administrative decision state the issues and reasons for its result?
  4. A tribunal allows written submissions and evidence, considers them and gives a reasoned decision under procedures that …
  5. A tribunal relies decisively on a report never put in the record or disclosed to the affected party, who had no chance …
  6. An agency sends detailed charges and supporting documents, gives the respondent a real opportunity to submit an answer …
  7. An adjudicator receives a subordinate's proposed finding, refuses to examine the contrary evidence properly submitted b…
  8. Explain why procedural flexibility in administrative adjudication does not mean that due process is optional.
  9. A tribunal relies on decisive evidence concealed from a respondent. Explain the administrative due-process issue.
  10. Why must an administrative adjudicator consider the record rather than simply accept a subordinate's conclusion?
  11. What does the substantial-evidence standard described in Ang Tibay require?
  12. Does the ability to use flexible administrative procedure remove the fundamental duty to consider a party’s properly pr…