Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: General Concept

Multiple Choice Medium Jurisprudence

Practice question

A judgment orders the ordinary Article 294 reinstatement remedy. The employer proposes rehiring the worker as a new probationary employee with no prior seniority solely because reinstatement was contested. Does that implement the stated remedy?
  1. Yes, the employer may erase all prior privileges automatically
  2. Yes, reinstatement always means a fresh hire
  3. Yes, litigation forfeits all seniority
  4. Yes, only the replacement may retain tenure
  5. No

Legal references

  • Labor Code, Articles 259-260, 278-279 and 294 (formerly 248-249, 263-264 and 279), as applicable: https://lawphil.net/statutes/presdecs/pd1974/pd_442_1974.html
  • Philippine Airlines v. Dawal, GR Nos. 173921 and 173952, February 24, 2016, main decision, gross economic CBA violations and dismissal proof: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2016/feb2016/gr_173921_2016.html
  • DOLE Department Order 147-15, Rule I-A, Sections 1-3 and 5.2, as applicable: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/10/71535

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.