Philippine Bar review · Topic
Distinguished from Estafa
Page 2 of practice questions on Distinguished from Estafa in Illegal Recruitment. Browse published questions and explore related topics for Philippine Bar…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Must the estafa analysis consider the particular victim’s induced disposition and damage?
- A recruiter makes the same lie to two applicants. One believes it and pays; the other recognizes the lie and makes no p…
- A genuine fee receipt is produced, but it records only payment for an actually delivered service and no deceit, induced…
- For one charge, competent proof establishes recruitment without authority. For a separate alleged estafa transaction, t…
- A recruiter is authorized but knowingly fabricates a foreign employer’s signed demand, inducing a victim to part with m…
- Compare what a fee receipt proves with what remains necessary for false-pretense estafa.
- Two applicants hear the same lie, but only one relies and parts with property. Explain why their alleged consummated es…
- Why does a valid recruitment license not immunize fabricated employer documents from estafa analysis?