Practice question
A worker seeks to prove the local agency knew of a later agreement only by showing that the foreign principal signed it. No other evidence of the agency’s knowledge or consent is offered. Under Sunace’s direction of imputation, is that reasoning sufficient by itself?
- Yes, principal knowledge always flows backward
- No; principal knowledge is not automatically imputed to the agent
- Yes, all recruiters know every event abroad by law
- Yes, signature by one party proves consent by every nonparty
- Yes, unrelated correspondence is always conclusive
Legal references
- Sunace, G.R. 161757, January 25, 2006: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/40781
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.