Philippine Bar review · Topic

Imputed Knowledge

Explore Imputed Knowledge in Liability of Local Recruiter and Foreign Employer for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. In Sunace, which direction did the Court identify for imputed knowledge in the agency relationship?
  2. Does the foreign employer’s knowledge automatically become the recruitment agent’s knowledge under Sunace’s imputed-kno…
  3. What did Sunace say about communication concerning withheld savings as proof of consent to a later contract extension?
  4. A foreign principal’s authorized recruitment agent receives material notice within the recruitment transaction it handl…
  5. A worker seeks to prove the local agency knew of a later agreement only by showing that the foreign principal signed it…
  6. After the original employment contract expires, a worker and foreign employer directly negotiate a genuinely new and se…
  7. A worker gives material notice about recruitment terms to an unrelated traveler at the airport, who has no actual or ap…
  8. Explain the direction of the imputed-knowledge theory applied in Sunace.
  9. Why did correspondence about withheld savings not necessarily prove the recruiter’s consent to the new contract in Suna…
  10. Distinguish Sunace’s genuinely new post-expiry contract issue from substitution of an ongoing covered overseas employme…
  11. Does Sunace’s rejection of reverse imputation forbid proving an agency’s actual knowledge through competent direct evid…
  12. In assessing a claimed agency ratification, must knowledge and consent be treated as automatically identical regardless…