Practice question
A recruiter’s genuine signed letter expressly approves the new agreement and its terms before implementation. Its participation is otherwise established. May it rely solely on Sunace to insist that proof of actual consent must be ignored?
- No; Sunace’s absence-of-proof finding is not immunity from different proved facts
- Yes; Sunace forbids using signed approval
- Yes; no recruiter can ever participate in a renewal
- Yes; approval is always legally meaningless
- Yes; signatures automatically belong only to the foreign employer
Legal references
- Sunace v NLRC GR161757 January25,2006 MAIN: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/40781 Evidence of knowledge and consent; direction of imputation; new post-expiry contract.
- Civil Code: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html Article1924.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.