Practice question
A worker repeatedly sends unwelcome sexual messages to a peer through the company’s work chat. The messages are offensive, affect the recipient’s dignity, and create a hostile work environment. No authority, influence, or moral ascendancy is established. The sender says all workplace sexual-harassment law is inapplicable because neither person supervises the other. Which analysis is best?
- The absence of supervision categorically defeats every applicable statute
- RA 11313’s workplace provisions can cover the stipulated peer and technology-enabled conduct; RA 7877’s separate elements should not be used to narrow that Act
- Company chat messages are never workplace conduct
- The recipient must accept the messages before any protection applies
- Only physical contact can constitute harassment
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1995/ra_7877_1995.html — RA 7877, sections 3–4, sexual-favor demand and workplace duties.
- https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2019/ra_11313_2019.html — RA 11313, sections 16–19, workplace gender-based sexual harassment and employer duties.
- https://www.scribd.com/document/586569329/DOLE-s-DO-No-230-Series-of-2021 — issued DO 230-21 text, Part I section 1, support coverage for domestic, informal-economy, and small-establishment workers.
- https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/nrmlx_en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB%3A12100%3A0%3A%3ANO%3A%3AP12100_INSTRUMENT_ID%3A3999810 — ILO C190, Articles 1–3, 9–10, 12, and 14.
- https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/nrmlx_en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB%3A11300%3A0%3A%3ANO%3A11300%3AP11300_INSTRUMENT_ID%3A3999810 — ILO ratification register, Philippines ratification February 20, 2024; Article 14 supplies twelve-month entry rule.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.