Practice question
A union obtains signatures approving a P500 extraordinary deduction for a specified educational activity and beneficiary. It then checks off P1500 for an unrelated undertaking, citing the original signatures. No mandatory-activity exception applies. Which is correct?
- The prior specific authority does not by itself cover the different amount and purpose
- Any signature authorizes unlimited deductions forever
- The employee’s stated amount is legally irrelevant
- The beneficiary and purpose need never match
- A majority vote eliminates all individual specificity
Legal references
- Labor Code Article250[241] current membership safeguards, read with RA9481: https://lawphil.net/statutes/presdecs/pd1974/pd_442a_1974.html Paragraphs(n)–(o), authorization scope.
- Del Pilar Academy v Del Pilar Employees Union GR170112 April30,2008 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/apr2008/gr_170112_2008.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.