Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Doctrine of Necessary Implication

Multiple Choice Easy

Practice question

What rationale supports the confidential-employee exclusion in labor relations?
  1. Eliminating every employee association
  2. Punishing technical skill
  3. Preventing all employees from learning their wages
  4. Avoiding conflicting loyalties and undue access to management's confidential bargaining or grievance position
  5. Making every employer decision unreviewable

Legal references

  • San Miguel Corporation Supervisors and Exempt Union v Laguesma, G.R. 110399, August 15 1997, main opinion: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1997/aug1997/gr_110399_1997.html
  • San Miguel Foods v SMC Supervisors and Exempt Union, G.R. 146206, August 1 2011, main opinion: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2011/aug2011/gr_146206_2011.html
  • National Association of Trade Unions v Torres, G.R. 93468, December 29 1994, doctrine of necessary implication: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1994/dec1994/gr_93468_1994.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.