Practice question
Did NATU expressly make its bank-position ruling applicable to all banks without examining evidence?
- No; it limited the ruling to the case and similarly situated persons
- Yes; every bank employee is automatically excluded
- Yes; every bank title conclusively proves confidentiality
- Yes; all future evidence is irrelevant
- Yes; all bank unions were prohibited
Legal references
- NATU v Torres GR93468 December29,1994 MAIN, necessary implication: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1994/dec1994/gr_93468_1994.html MAIN case-specific limitation.
- San Miguel Corporation Supervisors v Laguesma GR110399 August15,1997 MAIN, cumulative labor-nexus test: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1997/aug1997/gr_110399_1997.html Later cumulative test.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.