Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Doctrine of Necessary Implication

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A payroll master processes already determined salaries and ordinary compensation data. The employer identifies no duty involving confidential labor-relations policy, negotiations or grievance strategy, but claims the payroll title and access to figures automatically require exclusion. Which follows San Miguel Foods?
  1. Every payroll position is automatically excluded.
  2. Any compensation figure conclusively establishes management strategy.
  3. The employee must prove that no document is ever private.
  4. The asserted automatic exclusion is unsound; the actual functions and labor-relations connection must be established.
  5. No payroll employee can ever be excluded regardless of duties.

Legal references

  • San Miguel Corporation Supervisors and Exempt Union v Laguesma, G.R. 110399, August 15 1997, main opinion: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1997/aug1997/gr_110399_1997.html
  • San Miguel Foods v SMC Supervisors and Exempt Union, G.R. 146206, August 1 2011, main opinion: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2011/aug2011/gr_146206_2011.html
  • National Association of Trade Unions v Torres, G.R. 93468, December 29 1994, doctrine of necessary implication: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1994/dec1994/gr_93468_1994.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.