Practice question
A bank cites NATU to exclude every cashier at every bank solely by title, refusing to examine duties or the later labor-nexus test. Which correction is warranted?
- NATU expressly limited its evidentiary ruling; assess the actual role under the applicable confidential-employee test
- NATU expressly banned all bank unions
- The title is universal conclusive proof
- Later functional criteria must be ignored
- Bank employment alone defeats every organizing right
Legal references
- NATU v Torres GR93468 December29,1994 MAIN, necessary implication: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1994/dec1994/gr_93468_1994.html MAIN case-specific limitation.
- San Miguel Corporation Supervisors v Laguesma GR110399 August15,1997 MAIN, cumulative labor-nexus test: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1997/aug1997/gr_110399_1997.html Later cumulative test.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.