Practice question
In June 2026, an unorganized establishment has one legitimate union. The union presents membership affidavits and asks management to endorse a Rule VII direct SEBA request instead of a certification election. Management agrees because it wants to avoid an election. What is the best analysis?
- Employer endorsement revives any discontinued administrative procedure
- Membership affidavits alone compel issuance under the former Rule VII procedure
- The advisory affects only establishments with multiple unions
- Employer agreement and the absence of a rival do not revive the discontinued route; the lawful election process remains the means to establish exclusive status on these facts
- The union loses registration by presenting affidavits
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1989/ra_6715_1989.html — RA 6715, section 22, amending Labor Code Article 255: majority-selected exclusive representation and individual or group grievances.
- https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2007/ra_9481_2007.html — RA 9481, sections 1–2 and 11: union legal personality and certification election in an unorganized establishment.
- https://dole.gov.ph/labor-advisory/ — Official DOLE index, Labor Advisory 07 s. 2026: discontinuance of requests and processing for SEBA certification under Rule VII of DO 40-03, as amended.
- https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/nrmlx_en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB%3A13101%3A0%3A%3ANO%3A%3AP13101_COMMENT_ID%3A2319046 — Official ILO record reproducing the Philippine Government’s account of the final CA ruling and April 29, 2026 discontinuance of direct SEBA certification; used for that historical cutoff change.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.