Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Petition for Review to CA against Rulings of Voluntary Arbitrators

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A party sends only an informal notice that it dislikes the voluntary-arbitration result and never files the required CA petition for review. No exceptional relief is granted. Which is best?
  1. Every informal objection is necessarily a perfected Rule 43 appeal.
  2. A telephone call substitutes for all requirements.
  3. The arbitrator’s name alone perfects the appeal.
  4. The adverse party must draft the missing petition.
  5. The notice does not itself satisfy Rule 43’s prescribed petition route.

Legal references

  • Rules of Court, Rule 43 Sections 3-6, 10 and 12: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html
  • Guagua National Colleges v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 188492, August 28, 2018, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2018/aug2018/gr_188492_2018.html
  • DOLE Department Order 255-2025, Rules VI and VIII, reproduced issued text: https://www.scribd.com/document/1056241538/DO-255-25-Revised-Procedural-Guidelines-in-the-Conduct-of-Voluntary-Arbitration-Proceedings

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.