Philippine Bar review · Topic

Petition for Review to CA against Rulings of Voluntary Arbitrators

Explore Petition for Review to CA against Rulings of Voluntary Arbitrators in Procedure and Remedies for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What is the ordinary judicial appeal remedy from the ruling of a labor voluntary arbitrator, after the applicable recon…
  2. Under DO255-2025, within what period may the stated motion for reconsideration of the voluntary arbitrator’s ruling be …
  3. After resolution of the timely reconsideration motion, what is the ordinary Rule43 petition period confirmed in Guagua?
  4. A party wants reconsideration under current DO255 and assumes it may file a second motion as of right after the first i…
  5. A party argues that the voluntary arbitrator’s ten-day finality language means there can never be Rule43 review after a…
  6. An aggrieved party timely seeks reconsideration of a voluntary-arbitration award and receives its denial. It then files…
  7. A party files a timely, proper reconsideration motion with proof of service, identifying palpable errors in the arbitra…
  8. Distinguish the reconsideration period before a voluntary arbitrator from the period for the subsequent Rule43 petition.
  9. Explain the current treatment of reconsideration under DO255 without relying on an old prohibition.
  10. Why must the remedy from a labor voluntary-arbitration award be distinguished from ordinary review of an NLRC ruling?
  11. May an appropriate Rule 43 appeal from a labor voluntary arbitrator involve mixed questions of fact and law?
  12. How is the Rule 43 appeal ordinarily taken?