Technical Rules Not Binding

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

1. Under the current NLRC Rules, how are proceedings before the Labor Arbiter characterized?
2. What is the purpose of using reasonable fact-finding means under Article227[221]?
3. Under RuleI Section3 of the 2025 NLRC Rules, may pertinent Rules of Court provisions ever be used?
4. A party argues that nonlitigious proceedings allow the Labor Arbiter to decide on undisclosed evidence without any mean…
5. There is no applicable NLRC provision on a procedural detail. A pertinent court-rule analogy would advance expeditious …
6. An employee submits only an unsupported assertion of an essential fact. The employer gives relevant contrary records. T…
7. A tribunal is asked to use a reasonable ocular inspection and information from well-informed persons to resolve a factu…
8. Explain what technical rules not binding means in labor adjudication.
9. When may the Rules of Court be applied suppletorily under the 2025 NLRC Rules?
10. How should a Labor Arbiter reconcile nonlitigious proceedings with a disputed factual record?
11. Does Article 227’s relaxation of technical evidence rules prohibit a party from being represented by legal counsel?
12. Who must exercise complete control of proceedings at all stages under the statutory provision?