Practice question
In a disputed employment event, authenticated contemporaneous directives identify an available assignment, while the opposing party offers only a bare denial and no specific response to receipt or contents. A tribunal must decide what the record establishes. Which approach reflects Radaza?
- Weigh the actual relevant documents and denial in context rather than assume the allegation defeats them
- Accept every bare denial as conclusive
- Treat all employer documents as true regardless of authenticity
- Require criminal proof for every fact
- Ignore the documents because a complaint was filed
Legal references
- Radaza v. Alcatraz Security, GR 272859, February 19, 2026, main decision, substantial evidence: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2026/feb2026/gr_272859_2026.html
- Philippine Airlines v. Ahmee, GR Nos. 221065 and 221164, April 7, 2025, main decision, proof of payment: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/apr2025/gr_221065_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.