Practice question
Explain why the NLRC’s recital of substantial evidence does not insulate a factual conclusion supported only by an unrelated document.
Legal references
- Radaza v. Alcatraz Security, GR 272859, February 19, 2026, main decision, substantial evidence: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2026/feb2026/gr_272859_2026.html
- Philippine Airlines v. Ahmee, GR Nos. 221065 and 221164, April 7, 2025, main decision, proof of payment: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/apr2025/gr_221065_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.