Practice question
A decision recites substantial evidence but identifies no relevant support for its central factual finding. It relies entirely on sympathy and a speculation contradicted by the admitted record. The proponent says the phrase itself makes review impossible. Which is best?
- The phrase alone guarantees an adequate record
- Sympathy always replaces proof
- A finding must actually have relevant adequate evidentiary support; merely reciting the standard does not supply it
- No labor decision may ever be reviewed
- Every unsupported finding becomes final on signing
Legal references
- Radaza v.Alcatraz Security, GR272859, February19,2026: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2026/feb2026/gr_272859_2026.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.