Philippine Bar review · Topic
Retaliatory Measures
Explore Retaliatory Measures in Contracting or Subcontracting (DO 174, s. 2017; DC 01, s. 2017; EO 51, s. 2018) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under DO 174-17 section 27, which worker is expressly protected against retaliation?
- Which actor is expressly within section 27’s prohibition?
- Which conduct is expressly prohibited when used against a worker because of protected complaint or testimony activity?
- A contractor reduces a worker’s wages expressly because the worker filed a labor-standards complaint. The worker remain…
- A worker is scheduled to testify in another worker’s wage proceeding. Before testimony occurs, the contractor threatens…
- A principal instructs a contractor to remove two assigned workers because they testified in a labor-standards proceedin…
- A contractor holds a valid registration but admits cutting workers’ benefits because they filed wage complaints. A veri…
- State the protection against retaliatory measures under DO 174-17 section 27, identifying covered actors, worker activi…
- A principal demands removal of workers solely because they are lawfully organizing, and uses a contracting arrangement …
- Workers allege that a registered contractor reduced benefits because they testified in a wage case and seek cancellatio…
- Does Article 118 expressly condition protection for filing a wage complaint on winning an award?
- Does retaliatory refusal to pay earned wages fall within Article 118 even without changing the stated wage rate?