Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Study Settings View Stats

Topic

Question Type

Essay Multiple Choice

Question Source

All Jurisprudence based

0 tracked cards Political and Public International Law

The Philippines validly joins a multilateral trade agreement under which all members accept reciprocal limits on tariffs. A challenger identifies no conflict with a specific constitutional prohibition but argues that any limitation on future Philippine action necessarily destroys sovereignty. The challenger asks the Court to invalidate the agreement on that ground alone. Applying Tañada v. Angara, which conclusion is best?

Choose the Best Answer

The agreement is valid only if the Philippines assumes no enforceable obligation. The agreement is invalid because sovereignty excludes every international obligation. The agreement is necessarily valid even if it violates an express constitutional prohibition. The argument fails because a State may voluntarily accept reciprocal treaty limits without thereby ceasing to be sovereign.

Load another random question

Your Progress

No data Retention

Tracked Cards: 0
Accuracy: No data
Retained: 0

View Detailed Analytics

Difficulty Breakdown

Answer flashcards to build a real score-based difficulty breakdown.

Current Streak 0 Days

Start a streak with this card.

Suggested Decks

View All

Leech Cards

Review

No recent weak flashcards in your saved workbook.