Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Complex Crime Proper

Multiple Choice Easy

Practice question

Which is a recognized example of complex crime proper where the required facts are established?
  1. Two unrelated assaults occurring years apart.
  2. Every private commercial disagreement.
  3. Estafa committed through falsification of a public document used as the necessary means.
  4. Every unpaid loan without deceit.
  5. Every act merely followed by an investigation.

Legal references

  • Revised Penal Code, Article 48 as amended, text and current two-branch rule reproduced in People v Reyes, G.R. No. 260030, May 19, 2025: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/may2025/gr_260030_2025.html
  • Intestate Estate of Manolita Gonzales Vda. de Carungcong v People, G.R. No. 181409, February 11, 2010, main decision, necessary means and falsification-estafa: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/feb2010/gr_181409_2010.html
  • People v Sendaydiego, G.R. Nos. L-33253 and L-33254, January 20, 1978, main decision, falsification to conceal malversation distinguished from necessary means: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1978/jan1978/gr_33254_1978.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.