Philippine Bar review · Topic
Complex Crime Proper
Explore Complex Crime Proper in Plurality of Crimes for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What relationship defines complex crime proper under Article 48?
- In Carungcong, does necessary means mean that the first offense must be an indispensable element of every possible comm…
- Which is a recognized example of complex crime proper where the required facts are established?
- An offender falsifies a public authorization and uses it to obtain another person’s property through a proved estafa sc…
- An officer completes a malversation and later falsifies a record solely to conceal the completed taking. The falsificat…
- An accused argues that estafa can theoretically be committed without falsifying a public document, so the proved use of…
- A relative commits estafa through falsification of a public document against a family member. Assume the relationship w…
- Explain necessary means for complex crime proper and distinguish it from indispensable ingredient.
- Distinguish falsification used to carry out a misappropriation from falsification used solely to hide an already comple…
- Why must both component offenses and their relationship be established before imposing liability for complex crime prop…
- Does Reyes recognize malversation through falsification of public documents as complex crime proper?
- Is a prosecutor’s offense label alone controlling over the properly alleged facts?