Philippine Bar review · Topic

Complex Crime Proper

Explore Complex Crime Proper in Plurality of Crimes for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What relationship defines complex crime proper under Article 48?
  2. In Carungcong, does necessary means mean that the first offense must be an indispensable element of every possible comm…
  3. Which is a recognized example of complex crime proper where the required facts are established?
  4. An offender falsifies a public authorization and uses it to obtain another person’s property through a proved estafa sc…
  5. An officer completes a malversation and later falsifies a record solely to conceal the completed taking. The falsificat…
  6. An accused argues that estafa can theoretically be committed without falsifying a public document, so the proved use of…
  7. A relative commits estafa through falsification of a public document against a family member. Assume the relationship w…
  8. Explain necessary means for complex crime proper and distinguish it from indispensable ingredient.
  9. Distinguish falsification used to carry out a misappropriation from falsification used solely to hide an already comple…
  10. Why must both component offenses and their relationship be established before imposing liability for complex crime prop…
  11. Does Reyes recognize malversation through falsification of public documents as complex crime proper?
  12. Is a prosecutor’s offense label alone controlling over the properly alleged facts?