Practice question
A city accountant responsible for public accounts and a bank manager agree to alter payees and amounts on public checks. The alterations cause government payment of fictitious obligations and conversion of funds. The information alleges these elements, though its caption uses estafa. Which lesson from Reyes governs?
- The facts may establish malversation through public-document falsification; the caption is not conclusive
- The word estafa makes public-fund facts irrelevant
- A bank manager can never participate in a public-fund conspiracy
- Alteration of payees necessarily legalizes the payment
- No component elements need be alleged
Legal references
- People v Reyes GR260030 May19,2025 MAIN, Article48 and public-fund falsification: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/may2025/gr_260030_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.