Philippine Bar review · Topic
Recidivism
Page 2 of practice questions on Recidivism in Repetition of Crimes. Browse published questions and explore related topics for Philippine Bar review.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Must an aggravating circumstance relied upon against the accused be alleged in the information under Rule110?
- A prior final theft conviction is fully linked to the accused, and a later estafa is committed twenty years afterward. …
- A prior judgment bears a common name but the prosecution establishes that it concerned a different person. It offers no…
- The prosecution establishes a same-title prior final conviction but recidivism was not alleged in the information. It a…
- A prior final judgment is for the same accused and same RPC title, and Article14(9) is properly alleged and proved. The…
- Explain why a twenty-year gap does not alone defeat otherwise established Article14(9) recidivism, without treating it …
- A prior judgment concerns a different person with the same name as the accused. Explain the evidentiary defect in treat…
- A recidivism circumstance is proved but not alleged, and no valid amendment or applicable exception exists. Explain why…