Philippine Bar review · Topic
Recidivism
Explore Recidivism in Repetition of Crimes for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under Article 14(9), what relationship between the previous and current crimes is required for recidivism?
- What status must the previous conviction have for Article 14(9) recidivism?
- Does Article 14(9) require the previous and current crimes to have exactly the same statutory name?
- Before committing estafa, Ramon had already been convicted of theft by final judgment. Theft and estafa are both in Tit…
- Before a theft, Sonia had been convicted by final judgment of homicide. Homicide is in Title Eight, while theft is in T…
- Tomas was finally convicted of theft, fully served the sentence, and years later committed estafa. Both crimes fall wit…
- At a trial for theft, a prosecutor presents a police record listing two earlier theft arrests. The record contains no j…
- State the requisites of recidivism under Article 14(9), including what must be established about the earlier judgment a…
- Distinguish recidivism from reiteration and habitual delinquency without treating the terms as interchangeable.
- A prosecutor argues that every earlier criminal case proves recidivism. Explain how the defense and court should test t…
- Is Article14(9) recidivism itself a separate new crime?
- Does Article14(9) expressly impose habitual delinquency’s ten-year window on recidivism?