Practice question
A participant expressly offers guns to execute a proved common killing plan. The conspirators later use someone else’s guns. Does that substitution alone erase the offer’s furthering character under Ampatuan?
- No
- Yes; the offer becomes legally nonexistent
- Yes; only recovered bullets can show any participation
- Yes; every unused offer is necessarily acquiescence only
- Yes; the prosecution must disregard the offer
Legal references
- People v Datu Akmad Ampatuan GR258710 January27,2025 MAIN, furtherance and offered guns: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/jan2025/gr_258710_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.