As a Mode of Incurring Criminal Liability

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

1. As a mode of liability for an executed offense, what must conspiracy involve beyond mere association?
2. Is mere presence during a discussion of a criminal plan, without the requisite furthering participation, necessarily en…
3. What is the significance of an overt act in the conspiracy analysis discussed in Ampatuan?
4. Two persons knowingly execute an agreed robbery plan through coordinated assigned acts, with the common design and part…
5. A person proposes an ordinary offense to another, who rejects it. No execution or other special punishable act is estab…
6. Three people are charged together. The evidence shows that two deliberately perform coordinated roles in the crime, whi…
7. During a planning discussion, one attendee expresses approval but performs no act advancing or facilitating the plan. T…
8. Distinguish proving conspiracy from simply showing association among accused persons.
9. Why need not every proved conspirator personally perform every element of the jointly executed offense?
10. Explain why a rejected proposal does not automatically establish the recipient’s liability as a conspirator.
11. Can an offer to supply guns for carrying out a proved plot be an overt furthering act in Ampatuan’s discussion?
12. Must the offered guns actually be the weapons ultimately used for the offer to be in furtherance under the discussed re…