Practice question
A person merely imagines an impossible theft and performs no execution acts. May the prosecutor use social danger alone to replace the act requirement?
- No
- Yes; Article59 dispenses with all acts
- Yes; imagination is always a completed taking
- Yes; risk labels conclusively prove execution
- Yes; the intended property need never be identified
Legal references
- Revised Penal Code Articles4–5,8,16–22,59, specified provisions: https://lawphil.net/statutes/acts/act1930/act_3815_1930.html Articles4(2) and59; no obsolete fine computation.
- Intod v CA GR103119 October21,1992 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1992/oct1992/gr_103119_1992.html
- Jacinto v People GR162540 July13,2009 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jul2009/gr_162540_2009.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.