Philippine Bar review · Topic

Impossible Crime

Explore Impossible Crime in Criminal Liability for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. For Article 4(2), the intended act must be of what kind?
  2. Which mental component is required for an impossible crime?
  3. Which can explain the nonproduction of the intended offense under Article 4(2)?
  4. With intent to steal, a person puts a hand into another’s pocket to take the wallet believed to be there. The pocket wa…
  5. A person intending to poison another administers a substance believed lethal. It is completely harmless and inherently …
  6. A collector unlawfully diverts an employer’s check intending to obtain its face value. It is proved wholly worthless, u…
  7. In pursuing nonexistent valuables, an actor intentionally destroys another’s window. The destruction independently sati…
  8. State the requirements and limits of impossible-crime liability under Article 4(2). Why is a failed plan alone insuffic…
  9. A would-be thief reaches into an empty bag believing money is inside. In another case, money is present but the owner s…
  10. Explain Jacinto’s treatment of the worthless check and why its result should not be applied automatically to every dish…
  11. Does a private evil thought alone, without the performed acts required by Articles4(2) and59, establish an impossible c…
  12. Does Article59 direct consideration of social danger and the offender’s degree of criminality?