Philippine Bar review · Topic
Impossible Crime
Explore Impossible Crime in Criminal Liability for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- For Article 4(2), the intended act must be of what kind?
- Which mental component is required for an impossible crime?
- Which can explain the nonproduction of the intended offense under Article 4(2)?
- With intent to steal, a person puts a hand into another’s pocket to take the wallet believed to be there. The pocket wa…
- A person intending to poison another administers a substance believed lethal. It is completely harmless and inherently …
- A collector unlawfully diverts an employer’s check intending to obtain its face value. It is proved wholly worthless, u…
- In pursuing nonexistent valuables, an actor intentionally destroys another’s window. The destruction independently sati…
- State the requirements and limits of impossible-crime liability under Article 4(2). Why is a failed plan alone insuffic…
- A would-be thief reaches into an empty bag believing money is inside. In another case, money is present but the owner s…
- Explain Jacinto’s treatment of the worthless check and why its result should not be applied automatically to every dish…
- Does a private evil thought alone, without the performed acts required by Articles4(2) and59, establish an impossible c…
- Does Article59 direct consideration of social danger and the offender’s degree of criminality?