Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Terrorism Financing Prevention and Suppression Act (RA 10168, Secs. 4–14)

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

Funds are frozen under the first paragraph of Section 11. Their owner seeks sums reasonably needed for monthly family sustenance, counsel and family medical needs. A clerk asserts that Section 13 makes all such needs categorically irrelevant. Which is correct?
  1. No humanitarian withdrawal is contemplated.
  2. Section 13 recognizes withdrawal of sums reasonably needed as determined by the court for that category.
  3. The owner may withdraw every frozen asset unilaterally.
  4. Every request automatically proves the original freeze unlawful.
  5. A family member alone fixes an unrestricted amount binding on the court.

Legal references

  • RA 10168, Sections 4-7, 10 and 13, mental-element proof, participation and humanitarian exceptions: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2012/ra_10168_2012.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.