Philippine Bar review · Topic
Terrorism Financing Prevention and Suppression Act (RA 10168, Secs. 4–14)
Explore Terrorism Financing Prevention and Suppression Act (RA 10168, Secs. 4–14) in SPECIAL PENAL LAWS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under RA10168 Section4, must funds actually be used to carry out the terrorist crime before the defined financing offen…
- Section5 defines conspiracy to commit the covered financing or dealing offense through what combination?
- Which office receives the specific legal-assistance protection in RA10168 Section14?
- A financier deliberately makes funds available with proved knowledge they will be used in part to facilitate a terroris…
- PAO uses appropriated funds to provide free legal defense to a person charged under RA10168. No other improper conduct …
- A company processes transactions that constitute proved terrorism financing. Investigators seek imprisonment of every p…
- Two persons agree and decide to commit Section4 financing. Before any funds are transferred, their communications estab…
- Explain Section4’s actual-use rule and why an intercepted transfer does not necessarily defeat financing liability.
- Distinguish Section5 conspiracy from mere association with someone suspected of financing terrorism.
- Explain why Section9 does not automatically imprison every shareholder when a corporation commits an offense.
- Under RA 10168 Section 6, when does the described accomplice cooperate?
- What relative penalty does Section 6 prescribe for the specified accomplice?