Philippine Bar review · Topic
Swindling by Syndicate (PD 1689)
Page 2 of practice questions on Swindling by Syndicate (PD 1689) in SPECIAL PENAL LAWS. Browse published questions and explore related topics for Philippine…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What role does the investor’s reliance play in the deceit-based estafa examined in Baladjay?
- Organizers lure investors through a proved fictitious profitable business, then pay early promised returns solely from …
- An organizer denies ever soliciting investments. Credited direct testimony establishes that the organizer hired recruit…
- Five or more proven participants operate the covered fraudulent investment scheme. Only one accused is presently before…
- Investors lose money after a genuine enterprise fails. The evidence establishes no prior fraudulent representations ind…
- Explain why early payouts do not necessarily disprove a Ponzi scheme under Baladjay.
- Distinguish proof of actual participation from a corporate title or a bare denial in a syndicated-estafa prosecution.
- Must every alleged member of a proved swindling syndicate already be in custody before an accused presently on trial ca…