Practice question
A motion seeks to open and reveal sealed authorized recordings. The court proposes granting it without due notice or opportunity to be heard to the persons recorded, solely because the initial interception order was valid. What separate requirement matters?
- Initial authorization replaces every later safeguard
- Notice and opportunity to be heard on the opening motion
- Only the newspaper must receive notice
- Only the officer’s consent matters
- There is no separate opening procedure
Legal references
- RA4200 Section3, court custody and opening of authorized recordings: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1965/ra_4200_1965.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.