Philippine Bar review · Topic

Anti-Wire Tapping Act (RA 4200)

Explore Anti-Wire Tapping Act (RA 4200) in SPECIAL PENAL LAWS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Under RA 4200's general rule, whose authorization is required for the specified secret recording of a private communica…
  2. Under Ramirez, is a participant categorically outside RA 4200 merely because the recorded private conversation included…
  3. What does Section 4 provide for communications or information obtained in violation of RA 4200?
  4. Ana secretly tape-records a private conversation with Bea without Bea's authorization. Ana invokes only her own partici…
  5. Ben did not make an illegal private-conversation recording, but knowingly obtains a copy and replays it to others. No s…
  6. A peace officer investigating kidnapping seeks to rely solely on RA 4200 Section 3. His police chief gives written appr…
  7. A court issues a valid Section 3 interception order for sixty days. After that period expires, officers continue record…
  8. Explain RA 4200's general private-recording prohibition and Ramirez's treatment of a participating recorder. Is the int…
  9. Set out the principal safeguards for a court-authorized interception under RA 4200 Section 3, without assuming every cr…
  10. Discuss why a person who did not make an illegal recording may still incur liability, and why a transcript does not avo…
  11. Within what period after the authorized interception period expires must the recordings be deposited with the court und…
  12. In what form must those authorized recordings be deposited?