Philippine Bar review · Topic
Anti-Wire Tapping Act (RA 4200)
Explore Anti-Wire Tapping Act (RA 4200) in SPECIAL PENAL LAWS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under RA 4200's general rule, whose authorization is required for the specified secret recording of a private communica…
- Under Ramirez, is a participant categorically outside RA 4200 merely because the recorded private conversation included…
- What does Section 4 provide for communications or information obtained in violation of RA 4200?
- Ana secretly tape-records a private conversation with Bea without Bea's authorization. Ana invokes only her own partici…
- Ben did not make an illegal private-conversation recording, but knowingly obtains a copy and replays it to others. No s…
- A peace officer investigating kidnapping seeks to rely solely on RA 4200 Section 3. His police chief gives written appr…
- A court issues a valid Section 3 interception order for sixty days. After that period expires, officers continue record…
- Explain RA 4200's general private-recording prohibition and Ramirez's treatment of a participating recorder. Is the int…
- Set out the principal safeguards for a court-authorized interception under RA 4200 Section 3, without assuming every cr…
- Discuss why a person who did not make an illegal recording may still incur liability, and why a transcript does not avo…
- Within what period after the authorized interception period expires must the recordings be deposited with the court und…
- In what form must those authorized recordings be deposited?