Philippine Bar review · Topic
Anti-Terrorism Act (RA 11479)
Explore Anti-Terrorism Act (RA 11479) in SPECIAL PENAL LAWS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under RA11479 Section4, is the occurrence of ordinary property damage alone necessarily sufficient to establish terrori…
- Under Section7, conspiracy to commit terrorism requires two or more persons to do what?
- What did Calleja invalidate in the Section4 proviso?
- A peaceful labor protest involves advocacy and work stoppage, with no independently proved statutory terrorist acts or …
- An impartial state-recognized humanitarian organization provides qualifying humanitarian activities in conformity with …
- A group intentionally destroys critical infrastructure to create a public emergency and intimidate a segment of the pop…
- After Calleja, an agency relies solely on the invalidated second mode in Section25: adopting a designation request from…
- Explain why Section4 terrorism cannot be established solely by calling an accused dangerous or pointing to ordinary dam…
- Identify the two principal statutory portions declared unconstitutional in Calleja and explain why an unannotated copy …
- A state-recognized impartial humanitarian organization carries out activities conforming to international humanitarian …
- Which Anti-Terrorism Act provision expressly addresses planning, training, preparation and facilitation of terrorism?
- Under Section9, is the inciter described as taking direct part in terrorism’s commission?