Philippine Bar review · Topic

Anti-Terrorism Act (RA 11479)

Explore Anti-Terrorism Act (RA 11479) in SPECIAL PENAL LAWS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Under RA11479 Section4, is the occurrence of ordinary property damage alone necessarily sufficient to establish terrori…
  2. Under Section7, conspiracy to commit terrorism requires two or more persons to do what?
  3. What did Calleja invalidate in the Section4 proviso?
  4. A peaceful labor protest involves advocacy and work stoppage, with no independently proved statutory terrorist acts or …
  5. An impartial state-recognized humanitarian organization provides qualifying humanitarian activities in conformity with …
  6. A group intentionally destroys critical infrastructure to create a public emergency and intimidate a segment of the pop…
  7. After Calleja, an agency relies solely on the invalidated second mode in Section25: adopting a designation request from…
  8. Explain why Section4 terrorism cannot be established solely by calling an accused dangerous or pointing to ordinary dam…
  9. Identify the two principal statutory portions declared unconstitutional in Calleja and explain why an unannotated copy …
  10. A state-recognized impartial humanitarian organization carries out activities conforming to international humanitarian …
  11. Which Anti-Terrorism Act provision expressly addresses planning, training, preparation and facilitation of terrorism?
  12. Under Section9, is the inciter described as taking direct part in terrorism’s commission?