Practice question
An employer offers a recording stipulated to have been secured in violation of RA9995 in a quasi-judicial employment proceeding. It argues that owning the recording device cures admissibility. No statutory exemption or other lawful acquisition is established. Which conclusion follows Section7?
- Device ownership does not remove the express evidentiary exclusion
- Device ownership automatically cures illegality
- Every employer recording is admissible
- Quasi-judicial proceedings are excluded from Section7
- A useful recording is automatically lawful
Legal references
- RA9995 Sections3,5 and7: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2010/ra_9995_2010.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.