Philippine Bar review · Topic

Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act (RA 9995)

Explore Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act (RA 9995) in SPECIAL PENAL LAWS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Under RA9995, does consent to recording a sexual act by itself authorize later prohibited sharing of that recording?
  2. RA9995’s reasonable expectation of privacy can exist in which setting?
  3. Which is included in RA9995’s defined private area?
  4. A hidden camera records a person changing clothes in a private changing cubicle without consent. The person reasonably …
  5. With no written consent for copying or sharing, a person deliberately duplicates an intimate recording of a sexual act …
  6. Two adults consent to making a private recording of a sexual act for their own use. Months later, one uploads it to a g…
  7. A police investigator wants to use an intimate recording in a voyeurism investigation. She claims that being a peace of…
  8. Explain the distinction between consent to make an intimate recording and consent to distribute it under RA9995.
  9. A person is secretly filmed inside a public gym’s enclosed changing cubicle. Does the public location necessarily defea…
  10. Identify the safeguards for a peace officer seeking the Section6 evidentiary-use exemption.
  11. Under RA9995 Section7, where does its exclusionary rule apply?
  12. Does RA9995 Section3’s capture definition encompass still photography?