Philippine Bar review · Topic

Anti-Fencing Law of 1979 (PD 1612)

Page 2 of practice questions on Anti-Fencing Law of 1979 (PD 1612) in SPECIAL PENAL LAWS. Browse published questions and explore related topics for Philippine…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Must a fence personally retain the anticipated gain?
  2. A warehouse manager knowingly accepts goods proved stolen for profitable resale by the corporation. All other fencing e…
  3. A corporate officer is charged solely because of the officer’s title. The stipulated evidence establishes neither actua…
  4. A manager receives stolen computers for corporate resale. Obvious erased serial labels, an implausible seller story and…
  5. A receiver knowingly keeps goods proved stolen, intending profitable disposal for another. All remaining fencing elemen…
  6. Explain why corporate-officer fencing liability cannot be decided from an organizational chart alone.
  7. A manager knowingly keeps stolen goods so that an affiliated business can profit. No personal commission is promised. D…
  8. Explain why police recovery before resale does not necessarily negate completed fencing.