Philippine Bar review · Topic

Anti-Fencing Law of 1979 (PD 1612)

Explore Anti-Fencing Law of 1979 (PD 1612) in SPECIAL PENAL LAWS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. PD 1612 defines fencing in relation to proceeds of which predicate crimes?
  2. What knowledge standard appears in PD 1612's definition of fencing?
  3. Under Section 5 of PD 1612, possession of property proved to have been the subject of robbery or theft is what kind of …
  4. A dealer argues that he cannot commit fencing because he did not help plan or carry out the theft. Does that argument a…
  5. An established secondhand dealer plans to offer goods obtained from an unlicensed supplier for public sale. What does S…
  6. A complainant reports a stolen bicycle. The accused possesses a bicycle of the same brand, but the prosecution does not…
  7. A junk-shop operator buys identifiable stolen parts for resale from an unlicensed supplier under circumstances that wou…
  8. State the elements of fencing under PD 1612 and explain why the prosecution cannot establish guilt merely by showing th…
  9. Explain the factual foundation and rebuttable character of the Section 5 presumption of fencing. Apply your answer wher…
  10. Did RA 10951's adjustment of Revised Penal Code property-value thresholds automatically adjust the penalties in PD 1612…
  11. Does the statutory term fence include a corporation?
  12. Under Section 4, what connects a president, manager or other corporate officer to fencing liability?