Philippine Bar review · Topic
Anti-Fencing Law of 1979 (PD 1612)
Explore Anti-Fencing Law of 1979 (PD 1612) in SPECIAL PENAL LAWS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- PD 1612 defines fencing in relation to proceeds of which predicate crimes?
- What knowledge standard appears in PD 1612's definition of fencing?
- Under Section 5 of PD 1612, possession of property proved to have been the subject of robbery or theft is what kind of …
- A dealer argues that he cannot commit fencing because he did not help plan or carry out the theft. Does that argument a…
- An established secondhand dealer plans to offer goods obtained from an unlicensed supplier for public sale. What does S…
- A complainant reports a stolen bicycle. The accused possesses a bicycle of the same brand, but the prosecution does not…
- A junk-shop operator buys identifiable stolen parts for resale from an unlicensed supplier under circumstances that wou…
- State the elements of fencing under PD 1612 and explain why the prosecution cannot establish guilt merely by showing th…
- Explain the factual foundation and rebuttable character of the Section 5 presumption of fencing. Apply your answer wher…
- Did RA 10951's adjustment of Revised Penal Code property-value thresholds automatically adjust the penalties in PD 1612…
- Does the statutory term fence include a corporation?
- Under Section 4, what connects a president, manager or other corporate officer to fencing liability?